I was challenged to get my facts straight after my
Something Fishy here post linking to Kendra and Christine at Mary Queen of Peace, Radio Maria and concerning Dr. Anthony Fauchi, where I made two claims about Dr. Fauci.
1. Fauci backed Wuhan lab to help his research in "gain of function work" to give a virus a stronger ability to be more infectious. I referenced this
Newsweek article from 4/28/2020 but did not originally cite it.
This article discusses a few different dollar figures, mostly from 2019, arriving at a $7.4M total from two separate 5 year contracts for $3.7M each, the first starting in 2014, which you must deduce because Newsweek speaks of it ending in 2019 (2019-5=2014). The article you cite from FactCheck.org is sneaky, it does not say these claims are false, its title is that the claim is distorted. To arrive at the distorted conclusion, this article claims only $600,000 went to the Wuhan lab. Assuming I do not disagree with your $600,000 figure, this still begs the question if US money should go to China to study how to make virus' more infectious. I understand Fauci outsourced this work because it is not allowed in the US. The Newsweek article says this project was managed by EcoHealth Alliance, while the factcheck.org article says the grant was to EcoHealth Alliance, and
they claim that only $600,000 went to the Wuhan lab came in from an EcoHealth spokesman named Robert Kessler.
I'm not sure that actually counts a checking a fact.
One blatant misdirection in the article is Trump cited the total figure if the whole contract had gone to completion, $7.4M, but the contract was canceled, so the actual figure had to have been lower, but FactCheck.org uses this difference in insinuate the numbers were distorted. They were distorted by Fatcheck.org's omission.
I think FactCheck.org has a progressive bias, which is why
they hide inconvenient facts in some of their checks, such as "Does the new New York law allow full-term abortions?" Every Pro-Lifer knows the tricks, mother's health is the exception and the Pro-aborts gloss over its psychological underpinnings from Doe v. Bolton, and FactCheck.org is right in the Progressive camp with the same misdirection.
My 2nd claim was that Fauci works with and for Bill Gates, who has repeatedly been caught doctoring vaccines to cause miscarriages in child bearing age women and girls in Kenya - ostensibly to aid his world population control efforts, and paralyzing 490,000 and killed at least 7 children in India with his Polio vaccine trials. I happen to believe Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his
documentation of Gates' vaccine programs under his Children's Health Defense website.
If you care to defend Gates we can have that conversation, my point is
Tony Fauci works extensively with Gates, which is why I find him suspect.
Fauci only recommends medicine and vaccines that are expensive, which is just over the top frustrating when they are also basically useless, like Remdesivir.
I also think Fauci is hypocritical, for dismissing the effectiveness of masks, "they make you feel better" back
in March on 60 Minutes,
But he starts wearing a mask when the Corona Virus task force appears to be winding down.
I think Dr. Fauci is like most of the people in Washington DC (not all, but most), he's in it for himself through ties with Big Pharma, Gates Foundation, PePFar and WHO. I find him subtly manipulative.
This article discusses a few different dollar figures, mostly from 2019, arriving at a $7.4M total from two separate 5 year contracts for $3.7M each, the first starting in 2014, which you must deduce because Newsweek speaks of it ending in 2019 (2019-5=2014). The article you cite from FactCheck.org is sneaky, it does not say these claims are false, its title is that the claim is distorted. To arrive at the distorted conclusion, this article claims only $600,000 went to the Wuhan lab. Assuming I do not disagree with your $600,000 figure, this still begs the question if US money should go to China to study how to make virus' more infectious. I understand Fauci outsourced this work because it is not allowed in the US. The Newsweek article says this project was managed by EcoHealth Alliance, while the factcheck.org article says the grant was to EcoHealth Alliance, and they claim that only $600,000 went to the Wuhan lab came in from an EcoHealth spokesman named Robert Kessler.
I'm not sure that actually counts a checking a fact.
One blatant misdirection in the article is Trump cited the total figure if the whole contract had gone to completion, $7.4M, but the contract was canceled, so the actual figure had to have been lower, but FactCheck.org uses this difference in insinuate the numbers were distorted. They were distorted by Fatcheck.org's omission.
I think FactCheck.org has a progressive bias, which is why they hide inconvenient facts in some of their checks, such as "Does the new New York law allow full-term abortions?" Every Pro-Lifer knows the tricks, mother's health is the exception and the Pro-aborts gloss over its psychological underpinnings from Doe v. Bolton, and FactCheck.org is right in the Progressive camp with the same misdirection.
My 2nd claim was that Fauci works with and for Bill Gates, who has repeatedly been caught doctoring vaccines to cause miscarriages in child bearing age women and girls in Kenya - ostensibly to aid his world population control efforts, and paralyzing 490,000 and killed at least 7 children in India with his Polio vaccine trials. I happen to believe Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his documentation of Gates' vaccine programs under his Children's Health Defense website.
If you care to defend Gates we can have that conversation, my point is Tony Fauci works extensively with Gates, which is why I find him suspect.
Fauci only recommends medicine and vaccines that are expensive, which is just over the top frustrating when they are also basically useless, like Remdesivir.
I also think Fauci is hypocritical, for dismissing the effectiveness of masks, "they make you feel better" back in March on 60 Minutes,
But he starts wearing a mask when the Corona Virus task force appears to be winding down.
I think Dr. Fauci is like most of the people in Washington DC (not all, but most), he's in it for himself through ties with Big Pharma, Gates Foundation, PePFar and WHO. I find him subtly manipulative.
No comments :
Post a Comment