Consider;
The Trump Tower proposed for Moscow
Impetus came from one man, Felix Sater
Neither Trump nor Cohen appear interested despite Sater's multiple efforts
There is no Trump Tower in Moscow
Consider;
Russian gangster named Henry Greenberg, aka Henry Oknyansky approached Trump Campaign advisor Michael Caputo, who claimed to have derogatory information on Hillary Clinton. Caputo involved Roger Stone, who met with Oknyansky and Alexei Rasin, a Ukrainian associate involved in Florida real estate. At the meeting, Rasin offered to sell Stone proof of Clinton's involvement in money laundering. Stone refused the offer, stating that Trump would not pay for opposition research.
Consider;
one-time Trump campaign adviser George Papodopoulus, was told by London-based professor Joseph Mifsud that the Russian government had obtained "dirt" on candidate Clinton in the form of thousands of emails. Papodopoulus did not share this information with the Trump campaign, but did pass it to an Australian diplomat, so that it became public news.
Consider;
The Steele or 'Pissgate' dossier used by the FBI for FISA warrents to eavsdrop on Trump Tower was fabricated by Richard Steele, former British Intelligence office with MI-6
When you consider all these things, in light of what was not mentioned by Mueller, a pattern emerges. The provocateurs, Sater and Greenberg/Oknyansky were informants in the pay of the FBI, while Mifsud has a long relationship working with British Intelligence and MI-6. According to Mueller, no one from the Trump campaign approached anyone seeking opposition research on Hillary, from Russia or anywhere, but the Trump team was repeatedly approached by others with this dirt. The reason Mueller was disingenuous and dishonest is that he never investigated the approachers, and more significantly never identified them as FBI or MI-6 assets.
Apr 26, 2019
Why Mueller was both disingenuous and dishonest
The Mueller Report, while an exoneration of the President, upon further examination is both disingenuous and dishonest, and it appears the AG Bill Barr's light editing may have been intended to expose the bias and sloppiness of Mueller and Mueller's team.
Consider;
The Trump Tower proposed for Moscow
Impetus came from one man, Felix Sater
Neither Trump nor Cohen appear interested despite Sater's multiple efforts
There is no Trump Tower in Moscow
Consider;
Russian gangster named Henry Greenberg, aka Henry Oknyansky approached Trump Campaign advisor Michael Caputo, who claimed to have derogatory information on Hillary Clinton. Caputo involved Roger Stone, who met with Oknyansky and Alexei Rasin, a Ukrainian associate involved in Florida real estate. At the meeting, Rasin offered to sell Stone proof of Clinton's involvement in money laundering. Stone refused the offer, stating that Trump would not pay for opposition research.
Consider;
one-time Trump campaign adviser George Papodopoulus, was told by London-based professor Joseph Mifsud that the Russian government had obtained "dirt" on candidate Clinton in the form of thousands of emails. Papodopoulus did not share this information with the Trump campaign, but did pass it to an Australian diplomat, so that it became public news.
Consider;
The Steele or 'Pissgate' dossier used by the FBI for FISA warrents to eavsdrop on Trump Tower was fabricated by Richard Steele, former British Intelligence office with MI-6
When you consider all these things, in light of what was not mentioned by Mueller, a pattern emerges. The provocateurs, Sater and Greenberg/Oknyansky were informants in the pay of the FBI, while Mifsud has a long relationship working with British Intelligence and MI-6. According to Mueller, no one from the Trump campaign approached anyone seeking opposition research on Hillary, from Russia or anywhere, but the Trump team was repeatedly approached by others with this dirt. The reason Mueller was disingenuous and dishonest is that he never investigated the approachers, and more significantly never identified them as FBI or MI-6 assets.
Consider;
The Trump Tower proposed for Moscow
Impetus came from one man, Felix Sater
Neither Trump nor Cohen appear interested despite Sater's multiple efforts
There is no Trump Tower in Moscow
Consider;
Russian gangster named Henry Greenberg, aka Henry Oknyansky approached Trump Campaign advisor Michael Caputo, who claimed to have derogatory information on Hillary Clinton. Caputo involved Roger Stone, who met with Oknyansky and Alexei Rasin, a Ukrainian associate involved in Florida real estate. At the meeting, Rasin offered to sell Stone proof of Clinton's involvement in money laundering. Stone refused the offer, stating that Trump would not pay for opposition research.
Consider;
one-time Trump campaign adviser George Papodopoulus, was told by London-based professor Joseph Mifsud that the Russian government had obtained "dirt" on candidate Clinton in the form of thousands of emails. Papodopoulus did not share this information with the Trump campaign, but did pass it to an Australian diplomat, so that it became public news.
Consider;
The Steele or 'Pissgate' dossier used by the FBI for FISA warrents to eavsdrop on Trump Tower was fabricated by Richard Steele, former British Intelligence office with MI-6
When you consider all these things, in light of what was not mentioned by Mueller, a pattern emerges. The provocateurs, Sater and Greenberg/Oknyansky were informants in the pay of the FBI, while Mifsud has a long relationship working with British Intelligence and MI-6. According to Mueller, no one from the Trump campaign approached anyone seeking opposition research on Hillary, from Russia or anywhere, but the Trump team was repeatedly approached by others with this dirt. The reason Mueller was disingenuous and dishonest is that he never investigated the approachers, and more significantly never identified them as FBI or MI-6 assets.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
No comments :
Post a Comment