Where is the evidence of Russian collusion with President Trump in the U.S. Presidential election?
ZeroHedge writes about "one of the most articulate critics of the establishment Russia narrative and the Trump-Russia conspiracy theory" Real News host and producer Aaron Maté, who completely yet politely and calmly takes apart the entire collusion argument. Read about and watch Maté skillful demolition of Luke Harding, a journalist for The Guardian and author of New York Times bestseller Collusion: Secret Meetings, Dirty Money, and How Russia Helped Donald Trump Win.
As ZeroHedge states: "The entire interview followed this basic script. Harding makes an unfounded claim, Maté holds him to the fact that it’s unfounded, Harding sputters a bit and tries to zoom things out and point to a bigger-picture analysis of broader trends to distract from the fact that he’d just made an individual claim that was baseless, then winds up implying that Maté is only skeptical of the claims because he hasn’t lived in Russia as Harding has."
ZeroHedge sums up with:
"The reason Russiagaters speak so often in broad, sweeping terms? - saying there are too many suspicious things happening for there not to be a there there, that there’s too much smoke for there not to be fire? - ?is because when you zoom in and focus on any individual part of their conspiracy theory, it falls apart under the slightest amount of critical thinking (or as Harding calls it, “collusion rejectionism”)."
Watch the actual interview on
Youtube
As ZeroHedge states: "The entire interview followed this basic script. Harding makes an unfounded claim, Maté holds him to the fact that it’s unfounded, Harding sputters a bit and tries to zoom things out and point to a bigger-picture analysis of broader trends to distract from the fact that he’d just made an individual claim that was baseless, then winds up implying that Maté is only skeptical of the claims because he hasn’t lived in Russia as Harding has."
ZeroHedge sums up with:
"The reason Russiagaters speak so often in broad, sweeping terms? - saying there are too many suspicious things happening for there not to be a there there, that there’s too much smoke for there not to be fire? - ?is because when you zoom in and focus on any individual part of their conspiracy theory, it falls apart under the slightest amount of critical thinking (or as Harding calls it, “collusion rejectionism”)."
Watch the actual interview on Youtube
No comments :
Post a Comment